This is a discussion on Scenario, need input. within the CCW forums, part of the Armory category; Originally Posted by ginzo It turns out it is just his finger, are you in trouble? I’m in FL, the “castle doctrine” state. Any opinions, ...
| ||LinkBack||Thread Tools||Display Modes|
|August 14th, 2015, 02:01 PM||#16|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: St Petersburg, FL
Your right to shoot in the street is called the "Stand Your Ground" law. You can research the actual verbiage here:
776.032 Immunity from criminal prosecution and civil action for justifiable use or threatened use of force.—(1) A person who uses or threatens to use force as permitted in s. 776.012, s. 776.013, or s. 776.031 is justified in such conduct and is immune from criminal prosecution and civil action for the use or threatened use of such force by the person, personal representative, or heirs of the person against whom the force was used or threatened, unless the person against whom force was used or threatened is a law enforcement officer, as defined in s. 943.10(14), who was acting in the performance of his or her official duties and the officer identified himself or herself in accordance with any applicable law or the person using or threatening to use force knew or reasonably should have known that the person was a law enforcement officer. As used in this subsection, the term “criminal prosecution” includes arresting, detaining in custody, and charging or prosecuting the defendant.
(2) A law enforcement agency may use standard procedures for investigating the use or threatened use of force as described in subsection (1), but the agency may not arrest the person for using or threatening to use force unless it determines that there is probable cause that the force that was used or threatened was unlawful.
(3) The court shall award reasonable attorney’s fees, court costs, compensation for loss of income, and all expenses incurred by the defendant in defense of any civil action brought by a plaintiff if the court finds that the defendant is immune from prosecution as provided in subsection (1).
History.—s. 4, ch. 2005-27; s. 6, ch. 2014-195.
Statutes & Constitution :View Statutes : Online Sunshine
|August 14th, 2015, 02:42 PM||#17|
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: North Port, FL.
Thanks Jeff, I caught that after the fact, but didn't correct it. I'll do it now.
|January 22nd, 2016, 08:44 PM||#18|
Join Date: Jul 2008
You may have to convince a jury that he actually said those things and that you believed it when he said it and were truly in fear for your life.
If they don't believe you, you are in deep doo doo.
In the circumstances you describe, you shot an unarmed man andI hope you either have witnesses or your lawyer is F. Lee Bailey.
P.S. Don't shoot someone because you can, shoot them because you have no other choice.
Last edited by GentlemanJim; January 22nd, 2016 at 08:46 PM.
|February 29th, 2016, 11:08 AM||#19|
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: S.W. Ohio
Here in Ohio we have Castle doctrine which like Florida extends to your car or a relatives.. If it's a friends car, better step out and start walking.Unless a weapon is actually pulled and then they have what is called duty to retreat if it can be done safely. Here, when I took my CHL class they stressed the "Reasonable Person" term. Which means just because YOU say or even feel that your life was in danger doesnt cut it necessarily. It has to meet what a reasonable person would think/feel.
That being said, here and I guess everywhere that has any kind of self defense laws, 3things have to be present for it to be considered a good self defense shoot.
First they have to have intent. Someone saying I'm going to kill you doesn't necessarily meet intent. For example: If someone is across the street yelling I am going to kill you and all they have is a ball bat or a knife, unless they start advancing towards you it's going to be hard to prove intent as well as the next condition which is means.
Second is means to do grave bodily harm or cause death: As I said above if they are across the street with anything less than a firearm or bow and arrow etc. Then means won't apply. Now if they have a gun, then means is there, and I would say most reasonable folks would agree intent was present as well.
The third condition is opportunity: If someone says I'm going to kill you but then gets in a car and leaves,you can't start shooting at the car. And you cant shoot them the next day either lol
So here they teach those three conditions have to be present for self defense to be a defense... Folks really need to check out their local laws as well as other states laws if you are going to be traveling and carrying in those states. It's easy to get jammed up.
Last edited by Bama77; February 29th, 2016 at 11:11 AM.
|March 8th, 2016, 04:01 AM||#20|
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Miami, FL
I personally would never draw as a deterrent. I carry with one in the chamber and no safety for a reason. If I am in such a bad spot that I feel I must draw then I will fire.
My son (who is LEO and former USMC) and I debate this often, as his training allows him to pull a weapon as a show of force and for detainment. Where as my training is purely defensive and has no other purpose than to eliminate the immediate threat.
|November 3rd, 2016, 04:43 AM||#21|
Join Date: Apr 2012
There are down sides to any action you might take. If you live in a state that allows civil action, you can still wind up in court even if the criminal authorities clear you. Either way, Mr. Bad Guy, regardless how nefarious, has family and friends. These people will know you, your family and where you live. Chances are you'll have to move, probably out of state. Bottom line? Make yourself familiar with local laws and ensure situational awareness is at the top peg.
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Coyote Attack Scenario:||AKM Toting Seeker||Survival||8||December 26th, 2012 10:40 PM|
|most likely disaster scenario||the old one||Survival||24||November 3rd, 2011 12:57 PM|
|need ur input on 9c or 40c||blackangel042||MP Compact Pistols||17||September 26th, 2011 04:42 PM|
|Possible fail to fire scenario !!!||ford1342||MP Gunsmithing||3||June 18th, 2007 09:07 PM|