This is a discussion on Should I get the 442 Pro Series, Standard 442, or 642? within the MP Revolvers forums, part of the Smith & Wesson MP Forum category; I'm looking to get a revolver for a back up gun. This will be my first revolver purchase ever. I plan to carry it in ...
| ||LinkBack||Thread Tools||Display Modes|
|August 9th, 2013, 04:44 PM||#1|
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Detroit, MI
Should I get the 442 Pro Series, Standard 442, or 642?
I'm looking to get a revolver for a back up gun. This will be my first revolver purchase ever. I plan to carry it in a pocket holster. I've been reading about the difference between the 642/442 as I'm considering both but I like the black matte finish better. I like the idea of the Stainless cylinder on the 642 but as I stated I really like the black but the 442 is a Carbon Steel cylinder. I found that the Pro Series model 442 Moon Clip is a SS cylinder and is of course the black finish that I desire. It also comes machined for moon clips which is an added bonus even though I probably wouldn't put the moon clip thing to use considering it'll be a BUG.
So my question is: Is the Carbon Steel cylinder on the standard 442 prone to rust as some have stated? Or would it be fine with proper care? Or is the Pro Series 442 a better option and worth the extra cash? Or will the 642 hold up best out of all as far as finish is concerned?
If you could get the Pro Series 442 for the same price would you opt for that?
|August 10th, 2013, 08:09 AM||#2|
Join Date: May 2013
Great questions. I wrestled with the very same concerns when I was in the market for a new EDC. In my opinion you cannot go wrong with any of them. The moon clip thing is nothing to get excited about, but the pro does have a smother trigger right out of the box. That is the only advantage I see with the pro. The standard 442/642 will get the same smoother trigger with use. Does the pro have the internal lock? If so, avoid it. Beware the internal lock!
About the carbon steel cylinder (and barrel) in the 442, that is not always the case. S&W has built them using the same stainless steel parts in the past, just coated black. It is impossible to know what it is unless you take a magnet with you into the gun store. Even then, some stainless is slightly magnetic. It's hit and miss with the 442 being carbon steel. Most are.
I went with the 642 and love it. It's a nasty little gun with a big bark. I was not as concerned about the color as I was about the material. I too prefer black but need stainless, and the 642 is for sure SS. Nobody can see the color when it's concealed.
Ask yourself this: do you want the guy your about to pop to see the gun you have pointed at him? I hope that if I ever have to draw on someone, they see it, turn tail and run like hell. You never know, shinny can be a good thing.
A 642 loaded up with 148gn hardcast wadcutters is my primary carry, with a speed-strip or two of Speer Gold Dot 135gn +P short barrel. Wicked. Shoot one using +P and you'll know what I mean.
I do not feel under-gunned wearing this thing, it is enough for my daily in-town activities.
Good luck with your decision.
|August 10th, 2013, 04:13 PM||#3|
Join Date: Jan 2007
As to an uncoated, just blued carbon steel cylinder, yes it will certainly rust unless you use great care in keeping it clean, dry and oiled. Personally, I'd give up on the appearance and get the more functional carry gun.
| || |
|August 11th, 2013, 08:18 AM||#4|
Join Date: May 2013
To the OP: Get the 642 and some snap caps.
Last edited by FUBG; August 11th, 2013 at 08:22 AM.
|August 11th, 2013, 08:44 AM||#5|
Join Date: May 2013
Things to watch out for when buying a Airweight J-Frame:
I have heard of brand-new guns having cracked frames. This is a pain as it involves a new serial number and FFL fee. The frames crack on the flat that is located just under where the barrel screws in, just above the yoke. The crack is from over torquing the barrel at the factory. Actually, both problems are from over torquing.
Last edited by FUBG; August 11th, 2013 at 08:52 AM.
|Search tags for this page|
442 pro review,
s&w 442 pro review,
s&w 442 pro series,
s&w 442 vs 442 pro,
s&w 442 vs 642,
s&w 442 vs s&w 642,
s&w 642 pro review,
s&w 642 vs 442,
smith and wesson 442 pro series review,
smith and wesson 442 vs 642,
Click on a term to search for related topics.
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|XGrip Standard vs M&P||jsimpson4||MP Pistol Accessories||6||May 2nd, 2013 07:40 PM|
|M&P Pro vs standard?||Lancer X||MP Full Size Pistols||11||October 26th, 2012 08:17 PM|
|40 Pro Series vs. Standard||Wardlaw||MP Talk||6||February 10th, 2011 07:46 PM|
|First day with my new standard 9mm and 40S&W||Waldog||MP Range Reports||3||August 16th, 2008 07:45 PM|
|Why is the F series worth more than the ve series||poperb||Autoloaders||1||October 17th, 2007 05:24 AM|