MP-Pistol Forum banner

New M&P 40 has internal lock when it shouldn't?

7.2K views 14 replies 9 participants last post by  SMiller5488  
#1 ·
I recentley puchased a NIB M&P 40 Model 209200. This is confirmed by the label on the box and an email to S&W with serial number. I was told by S&W this was a non internal lock model that it should have a plug in it. Mine doesnt have a plug so I requested they send me one. Today I get the mail a package from S&W 2 keys for internal lock model. Inserted into pistol and sure enough it fits and locks pistol. Am I missing something here? I just sent them another email to confirm what I have here, I am waiting on a reply. I will post and let know what I am told. If anybody has any info for me on this please post.

Thanks.
 
#3 ·
Thats what I thought. I have confirmed that this a Model 209200 by the label on the case it came in, and also an email to S&W with the serial#, but it most definatley has an internal lock. I havent got a reply from S&W yet on what happened here. Once I do i will post and let know what comes of this.
 
#4 ·
If I'm not mistaken my MP40 was the 209200 & it has the mag disconnect. Yep just checked before I finished & posted this, mine is the 209200.
 
#6 ·
I have my M&P 40 on order & lay away at a local shop (Big Bucks) in Wexford I ordered mine with the mag disconnect. Out side of the key lock I wasn't aware of this feture you are referring to. I tried to look it up but nothing. And Jester the mag safety I'm having second thoughts about it, your view on this.
 
#7 ·
And Jester the mag safety I'm having second thoughts about it, your view on this.


Not Jester, but I've been using pistols with magazine safeties for over 20 years. If you compete in the various gun games and the range officers are excessively anal about actually having the striker go forward in a dry fire at the completion of a stage (which may not be all that good an idea), not having a magazine disconnector/safety may be easier on you. Personally, I just let the RO see my finger stroke the trigger and let him imagine the striker fell. I've never had an issue about it.



Now about the various mythical evil events that may befall you if your pistol has the device: Bullshit! I've watched over 2 million rounds go downrange, I've never seen a mechanical failure that prevented firing. The occasional failure to properly seat the magazine, yes. The cure for the improperly seated magazine is the exact same immediate action drill you'd use if your pistol didn't have the magazine disconnect. If you're reloading with a round in the chamber, that's a retention/tactical reload and you have the loaded mag right there at the pistol when you do it. This is a type of reload that's performed behind cover during a pause in the festivities, so by definition, there is no immediate threat you'd need to engage.



In the end, the decision is yours. Just don't make the decision based on fairy tales. FWIW, I started out decades ago firmly opposed to the concept of the magazine safety. I've come to value the device. I'll also point out that there's never been a lawsuit where the presence of the device caused death or significant injury.
 
#12 ·